For more team updates, check out our team page here.
The process
We’ve completed our scouting round reads for all 25 of our books, and we’ve selected our quarterfinalists. In the scouting round, at least two judges read the opening of each book, usually the first 20-25%. We conferred and discussed, and we’ve come to consensus on this list of six books for our Quarterfinalists. Each of these will get a full read by at least two judges as we narrow these six to our two Semifinalists.
The Quarterfinalists
Note: There is no meaning to the order in which these books are listed.
For more team updates, check out our team page here.
The process
The four of us on the team are continuing to work on our allotment of indie sci fi books. We cut our first ten books of our group of 25 entries a few weeks back, then seven more last week, and we’re back with two more cuts today. Because this is the scouting round of the competition, we did not read the full text of these books. Our goal was to have at least half of our team read the opening chapters of the book, usually reaching about 20-25% of the total length.
These are the final two scouting round cuts for our group. Each of these books was marked as a “Yes” by at least two judges, so they all found some significant love in the competition and were under consideration for our quarterfinalists. Our policy in reporting these cuts is to not list what we didn’t like about each book we cut, but instead to send them off with a plug for what we liked and for what kind of reader we think would enjoy the story. The short summaries below were written by various judges. If you are an author of one of these books and want more feedback on your book, including some of the reasons we didn’t advance it, I’m happy to correspond by email and share more information. I’m at dave@davedobsonbooks.com.
The SPSFC is unusual in indie book competitions in that it allows re-entry of the same book in subsequent years, and we encourage any entrant that we don’t pick, including these ten, to enter again in a future year, where you may encounter judges who are a better match for what you’re writing.
NEXT STEPS: Our next post will highlight the six quarterfinalists, which will all get full reads from at least two judges on the team as we narrow that group to our official two semifinalists.
The cuts
Note: There is no meaning to the order in which these books are listed.
All judges praised the writing and the intrigue of the story’s opening. One said, “Nice opener into a scene without heavy handed exposition, tight and economic prose. Lots of mystery and back story that makes me want to read on.”
Judges enjoyed the writing style and humor, finding the alternative science of the title intriguing. They also cited the pacing, the explanations of scientific oddities, and the zaniness and creativity of the world as strengths.
Our condolences go out to these authors, along with our respect for your efforts and our sincere best wishes for your success.
For more team updates, check out our team page here.
The process
The four of us on the team are continuing to work on our allotment of indie sci fi books. We cut our first ten books of our group of 25 entries a few weeks back, and we’re back with seven more cuts today. Because this is the scouting round of the competition, we did not read the full text of these books. Our goal was to have at least half of our team read the opening chapters of the book, usually reaching about 20-25% of the total length.
Each of these books was marked as a “Yes” by at least one judge, so they all found some love in the competition, and each was sampled by three of our four judges . Our policy in reporting these cuts is to not list what we didn’t like about each book we cut, but instead to send them off with a plug for what we liked and for what kind of reader we think would enjoy the story. The short summaries below were written by various judges. If you are an author of one of these books and want more feedback on your book, including some of the reasons we didn’t advance it, I’m happy to correspond by email and share more information. I’m at dave@davedobsonbooks.com.
The SPSFC is unusual in indie book competitions in that it allows re-entry of the same book in subsequent years, and we encourage any entrant that we don’t pick, including these ten, to enter again in a future year, where you may encounter judges who are a better match for what you’re writing.
NEXT STEPS: Our next post will narrow the remaining eight books to our quarterfinalists, which will all get full reads from at least two judges on the team as we narrow that group to our official two semifinalists. We haven’t agreed on an exact number of quarterfinalists yet, but it will probably be around five.
The cuts
Note: There is no meaning to the order in which these books are listed.
Judges praised the author’s voice and the world-building, largely conveyed through conversations between the characters, with snappy dialogue that moves the plot forward and characters who reveal depth quickly. The intrigue and espionage were a real plus in the opening chapters.
Judges really appreciated the worldbuilding, including anthropomorphic hyenas and fennecs on a colonized world. Playful character dynamics with great descriptions of feelings and relationships made this cozy coming of age story work.
Judges were intrigued by this time travel book with a fascinating premise: a team sent back from the near future to precolonial America to try to undo European colonization, prevent the deaths of millions of Native Americans, and set the world on a better path than where capitalism and exploitation will lead us.
A book about a future wracked by religious bigotry, with sexuality playing a major role in who lives and who dies. Judges appreciated the strong characters and the worldbuilding, complete with class differences and oppression and a social structure that seems extrapolated from some of the grimmer societies of the past plus some modern bigotry mixed in.
Judges found the world interesting and really detailed. This included significant backstories, as a new character took on the POV role in almost every chapter. We were intrigued by how the different pieces started to interrelate, including the titular mysterious AI, and the society that seems sort of positive but with a strong dystopian edge, along with terror attacks and crime in the mix.
A judge connected closely with Bernard, an older protagonist waiting for the end who must deal with his world being upended by a mysterious visitor. The mystery hadn’t quite taken full shape in the parts we read, but big things were definitely afoot, and mysteries abound.
This is a silly, funny book with a rapid, chaotic pace and a lot of fun worldbuilding. It gave one judge in particular a frenetic Hitchhiker’s Guide vibe, and the goofy interdependence between the various officers (and hidden monsters!) on the ship, coupled with the pace at which new misadventures were thrown in, was a lot of fun.
Our condolences go out to these authors, along with our respect for your efforts and our sincere best wishes for your success.
For more team updates, check out our team page here.
The process
The four of us on the team are making good progress on our initial allotment of 25 books, and unfortunately that means we’re ready to make our first cuts of this year’s competition. Because this is the scouting round of the competition, we did not read the full text of these books. Our goal was to have at least half of our team read the opening chapters of the book, usually reaching about 20-25% of the total length.
Obviously, the opinions of any four judges is highly subjective. If we cut your book, that in no way means that we didn’t like it or that it’s a bad book – it just means that there were other books that appealed to these four humans more. It’s the nature of these competitions to be subjective, and we know it’s stressful and difficult to endure cuts – our four judges have lots and lots of contest entries between them, most of which ended in being cut, so we’re sensitive to how much it hurts. Cutting books is the worst part of judging, just as being cut is the worst part of competing.
Our decision in reporting these cuts is to not list what we didn’t like about each book we cut, but instead to send them off with a plug for what we liked and for what kind of reader we think would enjoy the story. Our short summaries below were written by various judges. If you are an author of one of these books and want more feedback on your book, including some of the reasons we didn’t advance it, I’m happy to correspond by email and share more information. I’m at dave@davedobsonbooks.com.
The SPSFC is unusual in indie book competitions in that it allows re-entry of the same book in subsequent years, and we encourage any entrant that we don’t pick, including these ten, to enter again in a future year, where you may encounter judges who are a better match for what you’re writing.
The cuts
Note: There is no meaning to the order in which these books are listed.
With a complex world and a YA, dystopian, action-movie feel, there is a ton going on in this book, including mysteries about a society that brainwashes and controls its members. A Maze-Runner feel, although set farther in the future.
Dives deep into a faraway alien society operating under very different conditions from humans on Earth. The alien culture and government is interesting. At times felt almost like a parable. One judge wrote, “Great imagination for the alien world.”
Cyberpunk awesomeness focusing on a young woman with inexplicable clairvoyance that starts off a compelling mystery. For fans of mystery and a murky technically advanced world.
A dystopian military sci-fi tale of a world where regular humans exist in uneasy stalemate (and sometimes war) with genetically enhanced humans. A strong main character with a great voice. Two judges hailed the well-developed writing and interesting characters, including a non-speaking commando.
If you’re fed up with corporate control of society and want the people to rise up, this could be the book for you. A near-future dystopia (minus most of the -topia), where a corrupt system funnels people into jobs they don’t want, leads to a secret rebellion.
One judge writes, “I loved the enthusiasm and detail of the golem battles that really hit the ground running as soon as you opened the book. The main character and his family were easy to slip into and enjoy their dynamic. Overall great prose and perfect niche book for LitRPG fans.”
A complex dystopian story about the end of the world, with both superheroes and philosophy in abundance. Part of a series. Fans of Watchmen might enjoy this one.
A welcomed world on an established lunar colony with an inviting main character. There is a mystery going on in the background as you settle in with the characters. This would appeal to fans of YA science fiction.
What an opener full of intrigue and very good prose. The plot then takes off like a rocket with an interesting world where the solar system has been colonized and has been fractured into interesting political factions. There is good plot and intrigue going on in this story.
This is a perfect book for fans of arcane academia. The author does something really interesting by creating a common thread of all the great thinkers and inventors throughout history and begins to weave a story connecting them together.
Our condolences go out to these authors, along with our respect for your efforts and our sincere best wishes for your success.
Just a quick update and intro to our first-round judging for the 5th annual SPSFC. For more team updates, check out our team page here.
We’ve split our allotment of 25 books into two groups, one of 13 and one of 12. We split our four judges into two pairs and assigned one pair of judges to each group of books. We’ve been reading the first parts of each book, usually at least 20-25%, and recording brief notes and reactions, including indicating if we think the book would make a good quarterfinalist.
One pair of judges is almost done with their group, and the other pair is at 9/12 books read for each of them. Each judge is free to read outside their group and add more feedback, and our quickest reader has actually read the openings to 17 of the 25 books. We’ll do more crossing over to sample the other group’s top contenders and to build more feedback for all books, especially books that might have split reactions from the original two judges.
Once we have all of the books read and commented on, we’ll consult and pick our quarterfinalists. There’s no fixed number, but we’ll probably select 5-6 quarterfinalists for complete reads. At that point, we’ll get each book read in full by at least two judges to place them for the semifinals. We can pick only two semifinalists from our group.
Obviously, the opinions of only four judges is highly subjective. If your book ends up cut by us, that in no way means that we didn’t like it or that it’s a bad book – it just means that there were other books that appealed to these four humans more. It’s the nature of these competitions to be subjective, and we know it’s stressful and difficult to endure cuts – our four judges have lots and lots of contest entries between them, most of which ended in being cut, so we’re sensitive to how much it hurts.
My personal philosophy for the early round is not to try to list what we didn’t like about each book we cut, but instead to send them off with a plug for what we liked and for what kind of reader we think would enjoy the story. That’s what our cuts will look like. If you are an author in our group and want more info or feedback, I’m happy to correspond by email.
The SPSFC is unusual in indie book competitions in that it allows re-entry of the same book, and we encourage any entrant that we don’t pick to enter again in a future year, where you may encounter judges who are a better match for what you’re writing.
Here’s a preview of our 25 entries for the fifth annual SPSFC #5! Visit our team home page here for more information.
Note: These initial summaries don’t include any feedback from judges, who are only just starting to read for the contest. They’re just an advance look at the team’s allotment.
We’re excited to announce our allotment for the 5th annual Self-Published Science Fiction Competition. There are 125 total entries, and our team has 25 of them to read. We’ve been introducing five of them at a time. Here is the fifth set of five:
One reviewer calls this “A hyperdimensional transhumanist space opera thriller.” A normal guy forced into a ship with a killer, sent on a trans-galactic hunt for mysterious artifacts called ‘points.’ Amazon reviewers agree that it is thought-provoking, well-written, and significantly mind-bending. One reviewer says, “a great merger of philosophy, science, and drama that draws heavily from the eastern mystic heritage.“
Ret is the story of a brilliant inventor who becomes an outcast in his society, taking his family down with him, and launching a struggle against oppression. One Amazon reviewer says, “The story is situated in another universe, but still deals with modern day issues, life, love, heartbreak, family, conflict. struggles and social biases that all can relate to in today’s society.“
Winner of two other book awards, this tells the story of a human society that has expanded throughout our solar system. Humans are under hidden threat by aliens, and war is imminent. One Amazon reviewer says, “The more i read of this book the more i loved the details worked into the characters, the unfolding of the plot, and especially the thematic nuances that beckoned to some favorite classic authors of mine like Hermann Hesse and Isaac Asimov.“
This book has a thought-provoking concept at its heart: Can robots fall in love? One Amazon reviewer gushes, “There is something so special about THE WARM MACHINE that I haven’t quite gotten in anything else. The writing style is perfectly matched to the theme—mechanical and completely logical but with an underlying level of “anomalous” emotion that SWELLS throughout the book.” A 4.7 average rating on Amazon from 21 readers.
Kuzack’s book Wakers of the Cryocrypt was a semifinalist in last year’s SPSFC, emerging from my team. In this new book, he looks at a broken future governed by greed and corruption, where one man, denied his dreams, joins an underground resistance, where he will pay a steep price for fighting back.
And that’s all our intros! If you’d like to see the others, they’re all linked on our homepage.
Here’s a preview of our 25 entries for the fifth annual SPSFC #5! Visit our team home page here for more information.
Note: These initial summaries don’t include any feedback from judges, who are only just starting to read for the contest. They’re just an advance look at the team’s allotment.
We’re excited to announce our allotment for the 5th annual Self-Published Science Fiction Competition. There are 125 total entries, and our team has 25 of them to read. Here is the fourth set of five:
A dystopian YA story follows a young woman whose technological enhancements and implants also leave her subject to control by forces unseen. Prairies Book Review says, “Brisk and emotionally charged; a page-turner.”
Billed as humorous sci-fi with romance and adventure, this sounds like it has it all. One Amazon reviewer says, “a novel that lovingly lampoons sci-fi tropes while delivering a fast-moving plot centered around a likeable cast of oddballs.”
Billed as a “futuristic techno-thriller,” this looks like a story about vengeance for a murder. An exclusive new release via crowdfunding late last year, we don’t have a lot of reviews to go on, but we’ll never say no to trying out a cyberpunk game-infused thriller.
A dystopian military sci-fi book that’s been a finalist or placed in four other competitions. A marine facing family struggles discovers a terrorist plot to destroy humanity! Great stuff. A 4.7 average rating on Amazon from 87 readers.
What a great concept! Watching modern civilization die, a group of time travelers decide to go back to colonial times and change history, strengthening the Mohawk people to resist colonization. One Amazon reviewer says, “a bold and imaginative blend of historical fiction and speculative adventure that asks profound questions about history, destiny, and human resilience.”
We’ll do our next five book intros soon! Stay tuned on our homepage for more.
Here’s a preview of our 25 entries for the fifth annual SPSFC #5! Visit our team home page here for more information.
Note: These initial summaries don’t include any feedback from judges, who are only just starting to read for the contest. They’re just an advance look at the team’s allotment.
We’re excited to announce our allotment for the 5th annual Self-Published Science Fiction Competition. There are 125 total entries, and our team has 25 of them to read. Here are the third set of five:
Andrew was a semifinalist in SPSFC #4 last year with Our Lady of the Artilects. This new humorous sci-fi story tells of a doomed world and the reality show exploiting its soon-to-die residents. An Amazon reviewer calls it “a well written spoof that will keep you turning the pages until the early hours of the morning.“
A pair of humans, maybe allies, maybe enemies, struggle to survive on a far-future dying Earth. Readers seem to agree that it ably explores the fantastic and weird. One Amazon reviewer says, “The characters are bizarre and wonderful, with complex relationships and meaningful development.“
A dystopian story of a subversive woman and an AI bot solving mystery that could topple the world. Kirkus Reviews says, “Other novels have played in this high-tech sandbox, to be sure, but few have done so in a way that makes a reader think and care for both people and artificial entities in such strong and equal measure.” A 4.6 average rating on Amazon from 37 readers.
A collection of several works, this book centers around a lonely man and the mysterious girl who pulls him to another time. One Amazon reviewer says, “I truly enjoyed every moment of this collection, which weaves you through an unbelievable journey with believable characters.”
Sheila was a finalist in SPSFC#4 with the interesting and thought-provoking Bisection. In this book, a military sci-fi story, there’s a war between Mars and Earth, and a Martian noblewoman faces mutiny on her warship. One Amazon reviewer describes it as “a ripping good yarn in the tradition of an old adventure story.”
We’ll do our next five book intros soon! Stay tuned on our homepage for more.
Here’s a preview of our 25 entries for the fifth annual SPSFC #5! Visit our team home page here for more information.
Note: These initial summaries don’t include any feedback from judges, who are only just starting to read for the contest. They’re just an advance look at the team’s allotment.
We’re excited to announce our allotment for the 5th annual Self-Published Science Fiction Competition. There are 125 total entries, and our team has 25 of them to read. Here are the second set of five:
A middle grade sci-fi story about a coding camp on the Moon, with an army of coding kids and their associated shenanigans. The description has a ton of charm. A 4.9 average on Amazon from 17 readers.
Military sci-fi on Titan – very cool. One Amazon reviewer says it’s a “great read that keeps you engaged from beginning to end as it takes you on a futuristic adventure with profound emotional human connections.“
Definitely the creepiest of our covers! 🙂 Rhodes describes it as a “psychological post-superhero sci-fi thriller,” with a main character who is a prophet (and sounds like maybe a demigod), and a bleak future that may just have a chance at salvation if enemies can work together.
A future war involving Earth and Mars, with space travel and innocent lives in the balance. A 4.9 average rating on Amazon; one reviewer there says, “The characters are fun, interesting, will pull at your heart strings and exhibit realistic emotional depth.“
A near-future high-concept thriller about the end of knowledge and invention, and a hidden centuries-old conspiracy that may rewrite human history. One Amazon reviewer says, “Great read, solid story line, great pacing and just the right amount of intrigue to keep you wanting to always keep going.“
We’ll do our next five book intros soon! Stay tuned on our homepage for more.
